New House Rule: Do You Like it? 💫
Hi all, I just wanted to add a new house rule: Close discussions only with reason.
Sometimes I see discussions closed because the closer is jealous.
If the discussion closure's reason is obvious (spam/duplicate/language/inappropriate/off-topic) you don't need to tell. But if none of these apply, then you would need to do so. Tagging only a few players to share what they think:
@Diamond Lim @Crazy Cat Lad @Pounawea @Spinnifix @mysticalmysty @hechicerilla
If you have only just never experienced it, or don't totally understand, please do not vote no. This is important!
New House Rule: Do You Like it? 💫 2 votes
2 votes
Comments
-
Hello, I don't like that. Because this is up to the community managers and they decide what is important and what is done. Please understand. You are welcome to ask a CM privately. But here I think you're breaking a rule. I do not like it.
@kiara_wael What do you think? Otherwise please close! Thank you
-
The rules also includes:
. No selling stuff or redirecting our players to other sites
. Keep your personal information out of any public post.
. Don't incite complaints, campaign or lobby.
. Don’t question moderator actions publicly. What we say goes.
. Discussions of politics and religion are not allowed.
. Don’t get around our filters, that’s swearwords and other blocked terms.
. Don’t air interpersonal disputes.
_______________
Nobody closes anything for being jealous. There is always a reason. When you do not know the reason you can ask an SU, they will inform you. But the most common is that in the thread put why it has closed.
Now I'll ask @Sukanta_Biswas or @Glenn1972 to please close this. Thank you
-
-
Yep! I agree with @Spinnifix and @hechicerilla too.
-
Thank you all, what I was saying is about an issue, but since it's fixed, there's nothing I need more. Please close this discussion @Pounawea @Crazy Cat Lad @PrettyBubbles @kiara_wael @Elsa
