Sugar Drops in Candy Crush Saga - Information and feedback

1414244464753

Comments

  • Maureen-3Maureen-3 Posts: 161 Level 3

    People are leaving the game,, in the fantasy five my partner are gone so it is of no help,, I have said several times that I don't have chocolate BOXES and no a answer to this moment,,it is getting boring,, I am loyal player, am.At game 6303, please fix

  • Hey! Would you like to give us your opinion?

  • LuVerneLuVerne Posts: 24 Level 2

    I've also been getting a gorilla that says they're working on a solution when I am playing. It occurs mostly when trying to access the chocolate box or after playing several levels.

  • Maureen-3Maureen-3 Posts: 161 Level 3

    Another complaint O


    have,, I been asking for Lives and I am not getting any,, I used to get several a day,, not any more,, they want me to pay

  • PounaweaPounawea Posts: 3,670 Community Manager

    Hi everyone,

    As part of my as a Community Manager of this forum, I've been diligently sharing your feedback, opinion and thoughts with the Studio. Please be sure that they are constantly monitoring not only the information in-game but also the feedback I share with them on your behalf.

    The changes are still ongoing, and the Studio confirmed they will keep on running them for some time. As I shared with you yesterday, they couldn't really share with me a 'final date'. With all the information they are gathering, they will take a final decision. In my opinion, they always try to find a great balance (fun and also a bit challenging at the same time) and also a great game experience for all kind of players. As you know, this can take time.

    If I receive more information about the Sugar Drop changes, I'll share it with you.

    Welcome to the sweetest CommunityParticipate, share your feedback, and win prizes!
    👨‍👩‍👦‍👦   New to the Community? Sign up HERE in 2 seconds!

    🏆 🥇  Win Gold Bars and exclusive Community badges HERE!  🥇🏆
    _______________________________

    Want to PLAY?
    🍭  Play Candy Crush Saga    🥤  Play Candy Crush Soda Saga    👭  Play Candy Crush Friends Saga    
    🍮  Play Candy Crush Jelly Saga     🍏 Play Farm Heroes Saga 
  • Victor_10Victor_10 Posts: 17 Level 2

    This is literally a joke. After all the complaints by the players Candy Crush is till sticking these changes. To them they have this belief albeit a foolish belief that if we as players gave the 5 drop limit more time we would accept it, guess what Candy Crush IT'S NEVER GOIGN TO HAPPEN. I have literally stopped playing for almost 1 month now and it will continue until the folks at Candy Crush reverses there decision to limit Candy Drops to 5. Don't touch the candy drops. If you want players to get to 180 drops then don't restrict the players ability to collect them. This message is for the Community Manager and to all the Big Heads at King.com. I dare you to tell me that limiting Candy Drops to 5 per candy level is acceptable I FREAKING DARE YOU.

  • gnobahdignobahdi Posts: 7 Level 2

    I used to average 25 to 38 drops per level occasionally reaching 40s and on rare days 50.

    Even if they limit the drops to 20, that would at least be something. If there is a silver lining, though, it's that I spend less time trying to eek out as many drops as possible giving me more time away from my phone. However, this I believe is a gamble to the developers. Once most people have a long enough break from a game, they take the chance of losing them.

  • Ilana_MasadIlana_Masad Posts: 7 Level 2

    This change sucks so hard and I'm honestly really annoyed and disappointed.

  • Errol_SatzErrol_Satz Posts: 54 Level 3

    I have (I also play the simple timed version at royalgames.com.) Limited number of levels, flash not working well, syncing issues have made it an unpleasant experience for me. Sad because I think Facebook is bloody awful and I hated migrating there. Thanks anyways, and I would not mind reading more suggestions.

  • Von_3Von_3 Posts: 416 Level 3

    Victor - unfortunately King make the rules which are obviously designed to generate them vast amounts of cash. I understand this because they are a business set up for this purpose. They created one of the best and most successful game of its type and have millions of players worldwide.

    Having said that, the way they are going may long-term damage them because their recent reviews have taken a sharp downward turn which could put off potential new players.

    I too have not played the game since the 5 sugar drop was started and so many people I speak to have done the same. Most of us bought some boosters now and then.

    I think the only answer is to find a new game or read a book until,if ever, King changes its mind.

  • sissyksissyk Posts: 56 Level 3

    @pouanwea At last some comments from you that said NOTHING! Just some polite blah_blahingI still can't understand WHY this stupid test is still running, WHY the best long term players are chosen to be the lab rats? No clear answer until when it will continue! What is the purpose of this change? I guess to anger and frustrate players. Nobody reads our comments and no one gives a damn about our feeling and attitude. I'm sick of it and deeply disappointed. I'm stopping playing the game once I loved so much! No point to waste my time to get some meagre boosters. The big heads at the studio may think that with the time we'll get used to this change! I will NOT. And do not thank us for our understanding, because there isn't such!

  • Victor_10Victor_10 Posts: 17 Level 2

    Well Von I can give you and anybody else who is frustrated with King.com a list of games that if you play them you will find enjoyment. Tennis Champs from arcadepod.com, almost any game from Y8.com, Feudalism and Feudalism 2, Mechanical Commando 2. Yes most of those games require flash player but the way I see it either we wait for King to restore the Candy limit per candy level which before this "test" was unlimited until you reach 180 or you as players go out and try these games and then come on here and tell King how those games are way better than Candy Crush.

  • Von_3Von_3 Posts: 416 Level 3

    Thanks Victor, I shall check your suggestions out.

  • Sue_Coyle12Sue_Coyle12 Posts: 35 Level 2

    The studio must not care about the feedback that everyone has given. There is no one that things this change is good so what more do they need to change it back. Also, why do they nail you for more than one of their lab tests? Not only did you drop my sugar drops to 5, you also limited my chocolate box to only allowing to complete 1 a day. How do you thing this is fair when you are not treating everyone playing the game the same. Really disappointing.

  • Charly-4Charly-4 Posts: 97 Level 3

    There is a workaround to get unlimited sugar drops but it involves using the web based version at King.com. You can collect unlimited drops there and even doubles if you win the level BUT- and this is a really big but, you don't get prizes for some reason. SO, what I have been doing is playing just to the point of being within 2-5 sugar drops before the next prize is to be awarded and then going back to play one game through FB as usual. Today for example, I needed 60 sugar drops for the last challenge so I played two games on the web version where I collected 57 sugar drops total. Then i played on FB to win 5 and collect the prize. So I played three games to get 60 drops instead of 12 games. This has cut playing time drastically even with it being a much slower game on the web version and even with having to scroll slowly to find levels. Once, I thought I would go over the allowed amount to win so I just quit the game- you still collect the sugar drops. This may not be an option for everyone but it has worked for me.

  • mamacathymamacathy Posts: 95 Level 3

    I play ccs, I'm not happy but I'll take what I get, which is not much. Suzy fuller has been my go to, bear with me too. Suzy, I miss your audio videos, was so happy when I found one today. You sure have a lot of recordings, just hard to find the ones I need. Thank you, you sure are a busy friend!

This discussion has been closed.