🌐 Accessibility features: How are these new features helping you play? - Join HERE and a chance to Win Gold Bars
Comparison - Candy Games ♥♥♥
Comments
-
do not agree
I am not quite sure what to agree or disagree. If it is about the causality between availability of unlimited lives and how popular the CC games are, then I would disagree. I think the CC games have evolved into different games, all have their own flavours and characteristics.
I currently play CCS and CCFS. I occasionally played CCJS but haven't touched CCSS for years. I am at the highest levels with CCFS but only in the 2300 with CCS. Despite the games all started with 5 free lives, I can go through 5 lives in CCS in a very short time as some of the levels are short and difficult. If you don't get a decent board to start, you pretty much lost already. On the contrary, CCFS levels are pretty much all in 20-35 moves and take about couple minutes to play at least. A little less luck involved comparing to CCS IMHO. In that sense, I get a bit more "play value" from each life in CCFS.
I think each of the CC games have their own appeal, challenges and deficiencies (areas for improvement). Since I only play them as free games, I'll take whatever the games are given me and try to have fun. If the game is not fun to play anymore or some features (or deficiencies) are too annoying, I move on to play something else. Case in point, I was hooked on the Royal Championship in CCJS. However, the game play was changed that too much fluke / luck was involved, I stopped playing completely.
