Join the Soda Showdown! 🧟♂️🧙♀️ 💭
Earn rewards in the contest by joining the Witches or Zombies team!
What's happening in Soda in October? 👻🎃
🦇 Soda Halloween Season is here!
🆚 Join the Soda Halloween Showdown
🌐 Indonesian & Polish is now available in Soda! Celebrate and win Sodalicious rewards!
🦇 Soda Halloween Season is here!
🆚 Join the Soda Halloween Showdown
🌐 Indonesian & Polish is now available in Soda! Celebrate and win Sodalicious rewards!
🆚 Soda Showdown – 🧟 Zany Zombies vs. 🧙 Wicked Witches!
Comments
-
Hey there, and thanks for the suggestion!
While this challenge is already in motion, and we don't want to confuse team further - this is great for us to look at for the next ones.
I do want to add though that this assumes that all players are active in the challenge - if any player isn't active or takes part in the challenge 100% there also becomes an imbalance there, and this also makes it a bit more complicated for new joiners to follow as well. 😔 But I understand that it feels not super well balanced now with the current teams being in different numbers.
We'll try our best to balance Challenge #3 & #4 more so that this doesn't become as much of a problem!
-
🍁 I enjoy the change of season and the cooler weather.
Thank you for your response 🙂
This formulated model in calculating scores provides fairness and balance to unequal count of players for any team.
What you're referring to of inactive player/s is a performance issue which can't be controlled. It has no bearing in calculating scores fairly. Player's count is concrete while performance is conditional. This will depend on many things.
Without a clear and balanced calculating system, it will be unfair to the team with fewer members because even if everyone performs well, they will still be at a disadvantage. Inactivity can happen both ways.
Thanks @LoFiGummy 😊 Please don't stress yourself. At the end of the day, it's only a game. Perhaps rewards can be given more generously. 😁😂🤣 Fingers crossed.
-
As the manager said it may produce imbalance in a team with many inactive players. For example, if team Z has 17 members with one inactive members and team W had 21 members with five inactive.
I think if the challenge is competing with the total numbers of chocolate blocks, the limitations of total entries for whole team is a simpler way.
If the challenge is competing with high score, it doesn't favourable to a more members team obviously.
-
🍁 I enjoy the change of season and the cooler weather.
Inconsequential in what I suggested. 🙂 Thanks for your input.
Z: 17-1 = 16
W: 21-5 = 16
It evens out 😂Then there's no more problem. 🤣
Thanks for the laugh @michimune whether intended or not.
On a serious note, one has nothing to do with the other as I already explained previously. What you said after made sense but would disagree with the last statement. It's neither. All is needed is one player to produce a high score. It can come from either team. You'll never know.
Peace
-
Traci, this is Lisa the real ibnana, something is wrong with my account so I just made this one real quick, I can still play on my regular account, just can't access the community. Some technical issue that won't be dealt with in a timely manner, as this is the weekend. LOL 😆 what's the name of our team? II'll join it if there's room. To anyone that crescares, this is Ibnana2 aka Ibnana!!
