⭐️ The Community has a brand new look
Comments
-
I need the "Disagree" reaction so that I can only say that I do not agree with the author of the post. I don't need that reaction for anything else.
Here's an example for you. This is an absurd situation, but it may best explain what I mean.
The author of the post posted a picture and said that the picture shows a circle. I look at this picture and see that the picture shows an oval. I do not agree with the author of the post and I put the reaction "Disagree". Of course, then there will be a smart person who will write that we are just looking at the picture from a different viewing angle))). do you understand what I am talking about?
I don't want the rating of the author of the post to go down in the Community. I don't want the author of the post to have their reaction points reduced.
I just want to express my disagreement with what the author of the post said. Nothing more.
Therefore, I propose this option.
I offered 4 responses. The author of the post for all these four reactions should be awarded points according to the same rule. That is, it does not matter if I gave the author the reaction "Agree" or "Disagree", for any of my reactions he will be awarded the same number of points.
If such a scoring system for reactions is adopted, then Community members will not be tempted to use the Disagree reaction to lower an author's rating in the Community or humiliate him or offend him. They will think before giving a "disagree" reaction. In any case, the author of the post has nothing to lose. On the contrary, he will gain some points.
In addition, those Community members who only want to express their disagreement with this post will not feel guilty either. They will be able to honestly express their attitude to the post, and after that not be tormented by thoughts that they ruined the life of the author of the post.
It seems to me that this would be fair.
-
I totaly get your point. In my opinion 2 "problems" with the "disagree/dislike" option;
1) In general this Community is pretty positive minded. So adding a "negative" reaction button, is for me a no go. IF or when you disagree, e-talk to eachother and try to convince the person.
2) All the comment option are rewarded with points. So how do we rate "negative" comments? Reduce someone points? How does other people look at "negative" reactions? Do the stay silent? Are the influenced in there opinions? Do people stop posting because there opinion is "disliked"?
Like I said before, "Whoah" wasn't very important to me. The positive vibe though IS important to me. I love to see a "Thank you" button (with all the contest and positive for several reasons). Or something for the smaller games. Like "Blawsom" or "Sassy" equal to the COTR reaction "Whoah", highlighting a smaller game (forum).
my 2 cents
-
Part 1 of 4
You did not understand me.
You perceive the reaction "Disagree" as a negative reaction.
I perceive the "disagree" response as positive and helpful. I find this response equally useful as the "Agree" response. This is only a sign of my agreement or disagreement with the author of the post. Nothing more. These reactions are like two poles. They are equally important.
-
Part 2 of 4
1) The Community is so sweet that one of the important reasons for the existence of the Community is lost in this sweetness. The community has to move the games forward, it has to make them better. And if tough discussions are needed for this, then this is correct. In my opinion, a situation has now arisen in the Community where everyone loves each other, wishes everyone happiness, everyone says beautiful and kind words to each other.
But this does not help the development of games. It does not help the development of the Community or the members of the Community in any way. Now everything is so sweet that it makes the cheekbones cramp and therefore these sweets are difficult to chew.
-
Part 3 of 4
What does "if you don't agree, then talk to each other via email" mean? If I do not agree, then I want my opinion and my arguments to be heard by all members of the Community. E-mail.... Are you serious?
And if 10 people are interested in discussing the topic, how do you imagine this correspondence by mail? What if there are 100 of us?
Is our Community just a reservation for those who love sugar and chocolate. And those who love tomato or pepper do not have the right to vote here?
If so, then that's sad.
-
Part 4 of 4
2) What point reduction are you talking about?
I wrote the exact opposite sentence in that post of mine. I said that the "Agree" and "Disagree" reactions should be scored according to the same rule. The Community Member will not stop posting. He will know that under his post, for example, my reaction "Disagree" may appear. But he will know that this reaction of mine will not affect his rating in the Community, will not affect his status in the Community. This reaction will not deprive the player of badges and it will not deprive him of points in Community status. On the contrary, the number of his points will increase.
What's bad about it?
I believe that there is nothing wrong with this for the Community and for the members of the Community too.
But Community members will be able to express their opinion more widely. And this will reduce the number of negative posts in the Community.
-
@Cimbombom01 - Sorry for your reply because we can only use English Language that we can understand and help you on King Community. Don't worry! You make sure use Google Translate to translate English Language and repost your comments with using English Language on next time. You can also read the House Rules here as it's very important to be read about King Community! Thank you for your understanding!
