Welcome to the Candy Crush Saga Community
Do you have a question or need help with your game? Ask the Community.
🎣 Let’s Dive into the World of Jelly Fish🐟
Comments
-
I prefer the classic matching style 🍬 I’m not a fan of this new feature.
Hello @QueenB and all I prefer the previous fish style the new 2x2 fish features are not enough to destroy candies also the flying distance and road map is so small, I meant its flies only a little distance and destroy only one Candy. Whereas previously it's awesome and worked well. Thanks
1 -
It’s interesting 🤔 I like the idea but need more time to explore how it works.
Hi @QueenB thank you for the poll and @kiara_wael for tagging.
I like the fish so was very interested in this concept.
For me, at the moment it seems messed, it doesn't really work well. The board doesn't gel. I like to make fish, yet the board wants to behave like it did before the update.
I am not sure it as beneficial as stated.
1 -
I prefer the classic matching style 🍬 I’m not a fan of this new feature.
Definitely not a fan of the new fish. The old fish could be matched to striped or wrapped candies and you’d get that bonus effect no matter where the fish went (and you got it times 3!). Now if you match the fish to a stripe or wrapped you lose the bonus effect—the fish goes to one square and that’s it. I do not see how this is supposed to be an improvement. It is decidedly NOT more fun. You designers will do whatever, I know, but you’ve ruined the fish.
1 -
I prefer the classic matching style 🍬 I’m not a fan of this new feature.
Agreed, it is terrible!
0 -
I prefer the classic matching style 🍬 I’m not a fan of this new feature.
terrible! It was way better as it was originally. Definitely a downgrade, now it only takes out one piece instead of three. I could count on clearing a level many times knowing I could activate a fish and clear a level with targets across the board with my last move. And it moves badly on the screen too 😬
0 -
I prefer the classic matching style 🍬 I’m not a fan of this new feature.
Agreed
0
