Hi everyone,
For those heading into the final round of All Stars (3/3), I came across a Reddit suggestion that actually made a lot of sense. I’d really like to see something like this implemented by King, as it would create a much stronger sense of fair play and likely build more trust with players.
Here’s the idea (hypothetical example):
- 1,000 players total
- 10 lobbies
- 100 players per lobby
Now imagine grouping players based on their multipliers:
- Lobby 1: 100 players with 6x multipliers
- Lobby 2: 100 players with 5x multipliers
- Lobby 3: 100 players with 4x multipliers
- Lobby 4: 100 players with 3x multipliers
- Lobby 5: 100 players with 2x multipliers
- Lobby 6: 100 players with 1x multiplier
- Lobbies 7–10: players with 0 multipliers.
The way it’s currently set up just doesn’t feel right. No matter how much time or money you’ve invested, you can still end up in an extremely tough lobby and have little to no chance of winning. It often comes down more to luck than effort.
A system like this would feel much fairer and would help balance out what currently feels like a flawed format.
Curious to hear what others think. I know players with high multipliers might disagree, but try to look at it from the perspective of someone scoring 200k–400k just to keep up, especially when matched against players using multipliers heavily—or, on the flip side, being placed in easier early lobbies with inactive players or no competition.
