⭐️ The Community has a brand new look

Greetings @me6412 nice to see you! I liked the "Sassy" too!

too!

I like how you explained and simplified some points @ElenaVorona!

Do we have to limit it to just 4 though? Yes 4 cover the minimal basics, I agree.

@MollyS When thinking about the negativity that transpired at one point (more emotion than constructive conversation), "Sassy" used in the games for a brilliant move or set of moves, appeared to became more of a validation for some rather smart aleck or ranting comments. Kudos for the Team giving "Woah" a trial at replacing it. You're right @me6412 when trying to slow a horse "Woah" is great. Unfortunately, even when putting molasses in the water, you can't make it drink it it! So, some didn't pull up and woah appeared to be more of an underlying support for ranting rather than managing to rein it in. Go figure! lol Hence it's removal, reminders that sarcasm isn't always translated well or understood and it's subsequent removal also, whilst looking for something more uniform and positive. Culturally understood.

Awesome to read all the comments on this topic!🤩

Factoring the Roadmap map rewards for this particular activity and the functions of reactions.....The "Flag" is there for every member to utilize when something is either inappropriate, bullying in tone or going against Community Guidelines (and gives you the space to say why, anonymously.) Yet, something may not exactly be that harsh, just really unhelpful or unnecessary.

When wanting to offer support or encouragement for those facing something difficult in the real world, none of the reactions cover that. "Thankyou" is great for not having to post an actual thank you, even for congratulations on winning a contest or kudos for something?

"Love" and "Sweet" are very broad and general. Like..."cool" and "extremely cool". The emoji that goes next to it can also add/ take from it's meaning. 👍️being of multiuse. Great/ agree/ Understand what you are saying. Doesn't mean you agree with what or how it has been written though.🤔

Glad we are taking time with this topic and not rushing it, just to change it again later. Great community input!

I need the "Disagree" reaction so that I can only say that I do not agree with the author of the post. I don't need that reaction for anything else.

Here's an example for you. This is an absurd situation, but it may best explain what I mean.

The author of the post posted a picture and said that the picture shows a circle. I look at this picture and see that the picture shows an oval. I do not agree with the author of the post and I put the reaction "Disagree". Of course, then there will be a smart person who will write that we are just looking at the picture from a different viewing angle))). do you understand what I am talking about?

I don't want the rating of the author of the post to go down in the Community. I don't want the author of the post to have their reaction points reduced.

I just want to express my disagreement with what the author of the post said. Nothing more.

Therefore, I propose this option.

I offered 4 responses. The author of the post for all these four reactions should be awarded points according to the same rule. That is, it does not matter if I gave the author the reaction "Agree" or "Disagree", for any of my reactions he will be awarded the same number of points.

If such a scoring system for reactions is adopted, then Community members will not be tempted to use the Disagree reaction to lower an author's rating in the Community or humiliate him or offend him. They will think before giving a "disagree" reaction. In any case, the author of the post has nothing to lose. On the contrary, he will gain some points.

In addition, those Community members who only want to express their disagreement with this post will not feel guilty either. They will be able to honestly express their attitude to the post, and after that not be tormented by thoughts that they ruined the life of the author of the post.

It seems to me that this would be fair.