What's wrong with king lately?

oldmantrying

Don't know which is worse, 1859 or 1958. Come on king! Aren't you at least a little bit concerned about the players good views and PR of your game site? From the comments of several players it seems you are losing players who have most likely been playing for 1-2 years because of the ridiculous demands the timed levels are becoming. A little luck is expected to pass, but having to wait 300-400 games to get it is insane. We've gotten this far in the game so we do know how to play. Poor design that requires unreasonable luck just stinks. How about a NEW RULE before you release a level?  If your designers can't beat it 2 times in 300 tries without boosters don't let it out of your cage, it will just piss the players off. I hope you're listening. (Please no comments from the know it all peanut gallery players who always criticize complaints)

Cezdiamond

Hi there- Thanks for posting on King Care. We value the thoughts and opinions of our loyal players. We cannot promise to make all of the changes that you wish but we are constantly adapting to keep our games fun, exciting and challenging. 

We appreciate you taking the time to provide us with this feedback and we hope that you can find help from our great King Care community on some of those trickier levels. 

Have a sweet weekend! 

Baz_James

Really? You're allowed to whine and moan but we're not allowed to counter? Free speech but only for those who agree with you? I think you've overplayed your hand. I imagine King would be more than happy to be shot of the ungrateful whingers who can't cope with a bit of a challenge and clog up this forum with their nonsensical use of the word' impossible'. I don't think it's good PR for a game to be known as so easy that complete nincompoops can pass every level after two attempts. I see no reason in the world that a game, especially one that costs nothing, should be predicated on the belief that every player MUST be allowed to pass whatever their skill level.

1958 is a classic example of where the moaners get on their high horses saying it's all about luck when there is a very clear strategy involved. Good management of special candies doesn't guarantee success, of course, but an absence of it certainly guarantees failure. With many players reporting completion on the first or second attempt and many more within 10, this level passes your NEW RULE with flying colours anyway so even by your own standards your rant is ridiculous.

No doubt thanks in part to this campaign of griping the new episode (from 1971) has no timed levels at all and is absurdly easy throughout. If that continues for a few more weeks there certainly will be an exodus but of players that expect Candy Crush to be the best match 3 game in the business capable of giving them a proper challenge!