Welcome to the Candy Crush Saga Community
Do you have a question or need help with your game? Ask the Community.
This level was actually tweaked down in difficulty today already, it used to have full layer walls, 22 moves and more chocolate. I played it after tweaking and find it way more reasonable now than before! If the level is still too hard we'll tweak it down again, but since the changes had only been live for about 15 minutes when yo wrote this comment I can't imagine you've been stuck for too long yet 😉 Hopefully you'll already have passed it now 🤗
Did you manage to complete it😊?
No such luck for me... a bit easier, one gets a bit more success, but nadda (earlier i quit the board with 6-7 moves to spare now it gets closer like 1-2)... the group of spawners, and jelly generators bottom right, are impossible to get to (unless ofcourse one gets a CB and WC combo towards the end...
Has it been labelled correctly now, because still, it is at a minimum, a hard level. Like previously mentioned, honest labeling please...
A lot of negative discussion revolve around these tweaks... there seem to be quite a few on some levels... first, between 2 releases, then again as per complaints (my guess)... My question: How much say do the designers have after designing the level (which i suppose follows a brief), or do the marketing take over.
Also I would like to add , when majority of people play the game on androids and ios ( mobile ) , what’s the point of releasing the episodes on W10 , my concern is for the latest episodes if you check all of them are made relatively easy and with more moves , but god knows what keeps going wrong and these CC ppl Change it to make them tedious and boring which can’t be done without boosters ( if one has )
The aim of game Is to make money only by selling or earn little favouritism as well ??
In every episode there are minimum 5 rounds which are awful . 10150 had a big technical glitch and was not playable without buying extra moves , I wrote a mail to king, they changed it a bit now but imagine , with such presence does it suit them to make technically wrong rounds and players are supposed to point them out ? They must be paying their research team to get the task done or players are paid ?? No way no .. disappointed with this weird and I don’t care attitude of makers