Welcome to the Candy Crush Saga Community
Do you have a question or need help with your game? Ask the Community.
@QueenB Does this mean we will see less timed boosters as rewards from the existing game features now? Afterall if we can only win timed boosters how can we gain enough boosters to use the Converter.
People have been submitting ideas similar to this for years and the ideas have always been rejected due to a lack of votes.
Here is one example
https://community.king.com/en/candy-crush-saga/discussion/395735/booster-exchange/p1
Why has an idea that has been rejected been implemented instead of an active idea with hundreds of votes?
Level search, Portrait mode, Candy Royale, removal of the level rankings, last Dragon missing with all the feedback available from this community about existing issues why would King choose something rejected?
Can't vote, haven't got it and don't want it 😣
Timed boosters are absolutely useless. Their only purpose is to try and tie you to the game, meaning you can do nothing else or your time runs out. A total con job !!!
I'm not going to vote @QueenB . I don't expect a reply, I'm not asking a question, just giving my thoughts.
We keep being asked to vote on different features and changes to the game, but for what reason. We get told the feedback will be passed back to the team dealing but again for what reason. It certainly isn't to make the game sweeter for players. Let's take the New Saga Map Makeover - Check It Out thread. 56% said Sour, don't like it, 11% said they couldn't give a xxxx either way. 25% said Sweet and 6% said divine. We were then told the Health Hazard Map was going ahead anyway regardless of the large amount of feedback given, also causing many to stop playing. So please where is the incentive to bother voting on anything again as our thoughts and health really don't matter.
Thank you for bringing this idea to my attention. It's still active so we will make sure to update it as technically the idea is being tested.
It's true that many great ideas have been submitted over the years, including some similar to this one. It's important to understand that the decision-making process can be complex, and it often involves various factors and considerations. While previous ideas may not have been implemented due to a lack of votes, it doesn't mean that they were any less valuable or worthy.
In this particular case, the idea may have stood out for some reason, capturing the attention of decision-makers despite its previous rejection. Sometimes, new insights or perspectives can shed light on the potential of an idea, and circumstances might have changed to make its implementation more feasible now.
Ultimately, the implementation of this idea could be seen as an opportunity to embrace change and explore new possibilities.
As for seeing less timed boosters, I don't have the answer to that but I have passed on your feedback 😉