Sign Up!

๐ŸŒถ๏ธ๐Ÿฌ Hot & Sweet right now in Candy Crush Saga!

What are they doing to this game?

My last discussion title disappeared, so I try a different one.

ยซ1

Comments

  • christinewupp
    christinewupp Posts: 9,575
    edited November 28

    I am deeply saddened to have to report this here but King are running tests on one of my games which are quite disturbing in my opinion. As a serial "tester" of how to play Candy Crush I could not help but notice the missing fish in level 1236.

    I failed to take a screenshot of my opening board thinking I could do so on replaying the level, but when I replay the fish is there:

    As the two outer jellies at the top cannot be gotten at by any means other than fish this would make this level impossible to pass without the fish. In my game the fish was replaced by frosting when I started playing this episode just now.

    Now you could speculate that this is a glitch. But I think I have evidence that this is deliberate. I had a super colour bomb so would have lost this if I had failed this level on my first attempt. With five colours on the board the only other chances of passing this level, two separate wrap/stripe combos or a double colour bomb, would be so remote as to be impossible.

    Think again:

    I got exactly that the moment I ran out of moves: A double colour bomb. To be able to post here I paid the 10 gold so I can post my evidence. Please note that the 5 moves are the extra five moves I have just bought.

    This must be King's latest and dirtiest trick to get us to pay to play on with gold or use a party popper. It is so obvious I want to cry.

    @MannyFae I kept saying here that I had a really bad feeling about these most recent changes in the game. I felt something like this coming in my gut.

    @QueenB is there any way still to stop this kind of manipulation from being rolled out to all players? So far this one is probably only a test group, but this rewrite is going too far. This is "pay to keep your super colour bomb" . It is far too obvious. Please tell someone at headquarters. Although I have no definite evidence of the missing fish I swear on my father's grave that the fish was replaced by frosting on my first attempt. I am really upset King are even considering introducing this. Even testing this is outrageous. Is there a way to stoop any lower?

  • QueenB
    QueenB Posts: 15,357

    Thank you for sharing your feedback about level 1236. I understand your concerns, and truly value the time youโ€™ve taken to let us know about your experience.

    Iโ€™ve passed your comments on to our development team for review and waiting to hear back!

  • SneakyMelonPyroDuck
    SneakyMelonPyroDuck Posts: 41

    Level 3

    You are making the assumption that they tested or even know what the original mechanics for the level were. I am pretty sure it is just an automated process that no one actually checks.

  • christinewupp
    christinewupp Posts: 9,575

    I have played the Warcraft games since I created this thread and while doing so my mind has wondered and I have come up with a theory of what may underpin all these recent changes we have seen.

    I managed to score 174,600 purple per hour, bringing me to the top of my leaderboard easily of course. I used the following method:

    • No thinking, just bashing away at the dumbed down boards (remember I am part of a test group with moronically boring board designs involving nothing but the most basic of elements, mostly frosting, rainbow twist, key droppers and striped candy dispensers)
    • Using the super colour bombs and using boosters or paying for extra moves to keep this feature going, so essentially paying whatever gold it costs to keep my top win streak
    • Using gold to buy boosters, including timed starting boosters so I start each level with those

    In the past I used to achieve similar scores for purple using my preferred method of using experience and pattern recognition skills to assess the board while I was playing and strategically get the best out of the boards and use boosters wisely.

    These boards (levels 1000-1300 so far in my game) as so simple that the only strategy needed is to bash through the many levels the game will make us automatically win without thinking thanks to the starting and win streak boosters and the super colour bombs and then pay your way out of those that the game won't let you win.

    This makes me predict this:

    Candy Crush is being changed from a puzzle game to a gaming experience.

    The New Candy Crush is going to be aimed at the wider audience who wish to be able to make money by playing and have the chance to win cash prizes. So all these changes are really a big test run to see if any Tom Dick or Harry can win All Stars.

    The verdict I can give is: Yes they can.

    With dumbed down game boards and dumbed down event strategies King can indeed claim that anyone can start to play this game now, and if they are willing to put enough time into it can win All Stars and beat the nerdy experienced players like us. I used to liken All Stars to the Olympic Games: Only someone like Usain Bolt can win the 100 metres at the Olympics, to win at the Olympics takes a combination of hard work and an innate skill or gift. In the past All Stars was similar to this, it took both hard work and an innate ability for pattern recognition to get to the finals. I think King want the New Candy Crush and the New All Stars to become like a School Sports Day or Village Fete: Fun for everyone and everyone gets a chance to win.

    Only: It isn't actually fun if it's that easy.

    Count me out.

  • christinewupp
    christinewupp Posts: 9,575
    edited November 28

    No I'm not making any such assumptions. What I have noted and I am trying to point out here is that the board on my first attempt was a different design to the board on my second and subsequent attempts. Testing or no testing, and I'm sure you are right this one slipped through the net, it probably was an error in the code and should not have been this obvious, but it was there and I saw it! That is what upsets me. That I have seen with my own eyes how the game has created a board that is impossible to pass and then dangles two colour bombs in front of my eyes so I will pay to keep my win streak. I'm sure they didn't want me to see it and will change the level now QueenB has been alerted, but I saw this and am 100% certain that on my first attempt, when I had super colour bombs enabled and was on a top win streak there was no fish on that board but there was frosting instead of the fish, and on my next attempt and when scrolling back in my other games the fish is there. I have never seen anything like this before. It may be automated but this kind of occurrence can only happen if someone has instructed the computer to create a different board on our first attempt, one that will mean we have to pay to pass. And on this occasion the AI found no other way to achieve this than to remove the fish.

  • christinewupp
    christinewupp Posts: 9,575
    edited November 28
  • Deal_One
    Deal_One Posts: 415

    @christinewupp I had a couple posts that needed approval also. I had never saw this before until it happened to me. I believe it was a post about the troll couple weeks back.

  • QueenB
    QueenB Posts: 15,357
    edited November 28

    I'm back ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

    The Level Designers checked it out and could not find any issues but wanted to share a quick tip:

    Focus on clearing the big square of jelly first, then aim for the fish candies at the very end. This will help them target those tricky corner jellies.

    They also wondered if you still get 3 fish from the placed fish?

    As for your comments ending up for Approval, I have taken care of this now! Our system had detected some spams and it takes extra precaution until we have had a look at it.

    Let me know if you have any feedback ๐Ÿ˜Š

  • christinewupp
    christinewupp Posts: 9,575
    edited November 29

    Thanks for getting back to me @QueenB . I am sorry but you seem to have misunderstood my original post: There was no fish on my initial opening board. That space right at the bottom of the board where on my screenshot you can see a fish was actually filled with frosting on my opening board on my first attempt at this level. So there were no fishes. I had not enabled any fish boosters either. Of course no one will believe me now because I failed to take a screenshot, but I know that on my first attempt the fishes were absent from this board. Yes, I do get three fishes for each fish played, but if there is no fish then that will be 0 x 3 fishes, which still equals zero fishes.

    The game in question is a re-write of the levels without the conveyor belts, which I have found incredibly boring to play. Please also check this thread:

    The loss of the conveyor belts is terrible and I think this is a more important issue than the one faulty level I encountered.

    Thanks very much for finding my post and getting it approved!

Hey! Would you like to give us your opinion?